Template:Did you know nominations/She Has a Name

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rcsprinter (articulate) @ 10:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

She Has a Name

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that She Has a Name is a Canadian play about child prostitution in Thailand?

Created/expanded by Neelix (talk). Self nom at 16:41, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Joyful, Joyful

• Lead seems not to correctly summarize the topic. Also, i had some trouble finding which is the reference which supports the hook. Also, the hook is almost what the lead says. —Hahc21 06:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Reference 2 (the Eye See media one) states that the play is about "a young girl, forced to work as a prostitute in a Bangkok brothel". What is incorrect about the lede? Should the lede and the hook differ? Neelix (talk) 01:45, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

• Needs a full review, as original reviewer has not returned. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:46, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

The lead is only one sentence but it actually does summarize the topic: it is a play about this subject. The text is quite comprehensive so I suppose a few sentences could be added to the lead but I don't think there is any problem with the single sentence in this case. The article was new the day the DYK was posted. It has been expanded 10-fold since then so it is more than long enough. It has many references; some of which were added later. Nineteen of these references are available through on line links and every one of them supports the hook because every one of them states the subject of the play. The hook is restated in paraphrased form more than once and supported each time by a citation. The text is a good synthesis of the various articles and is made comprehensive by taking details that appear in less than all of the articles. I found no copyright violations or other policy problems. Hook is only 125 characters with the hidden characters, interesting, accurate, cited with inline citation and neutral. It is not about any specific identified or identifiable living person. QPQ is done. No image. Good to go in my opinion. Donner60 (talk) 04:37, 26 July 2012 (UTC)