- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 16:18, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Seven Days (magazine)
5x expanded by Cielquiparle (talk) and Congha2540 (talk). Nominated by Cielquiparle (talk) at 23:12, 23 September 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Currently at 7,898 characters of prose and was 886 characters just before expansion, so much more than a 5x expansion. The only thing Earwig picks up on is something quoted in the article, which is fine, though I feel like the quote could be reworded so that we don't have to rely on that much text copied from another source but I don't think its long enough that it's a problem by any means. All the hooks are cited and interesting, looks good to go. - Aoidh (talk) 21:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
T:DYK/P2
Currently at 7,898 characters of prose and was 886 characters just before expansion, so much more than a 5x expansion. The only thing Earwig picks up on is something quoted in the article, which is fine, though I feel like the quote could be reworded so that we don't have to rely on that much text copied from another source but I don't think its long enough that it's a problem by any means. All the hooks are cited and interesting, looks good to go. - Aoidh (talk) 21:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)