Template:Did you know nominations/Schmerber v. California
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:11, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Schmerber v. California edit
- ... that some scholars fear the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Schmerber v. California will one day be used to justify the involuntary mind reading of criminal suspects?
- Reviewed: Egleston
5x expanded by Notecardforfree (talk). Self-nominated at 09:13, 29 June 2015 (UTC).
Absolutely fascinating article and hook to back it up. 5X expansion within date, quality referencing and prose, length and QPQ satisfactory. Excellent piece of work. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 21:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
