Template:Did you know nominations/Saunders Creek, Alberta

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:52, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Saunders Creek, Alberta edit

  • ... that at Saunders Creek, Alberta, coal miners would climb over the greased carcass of a pig on July 1? Source: Information poster at the site, pictured at left in the article (legible at higher resolution).
    • ALT1:... that at Saunders Creek, Alberta, the stairs adjacent to the hotel were a popular toboggan run in the winter months? Source: Information poster at the site, pictured at left in the article (legible at higher resolution).
  • Reviewed: This is only my second DYK nomination so I am exempt from the QPQ requirement.

Created by Georgialh (talk). Self-nominated at 21:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC).

  • The article is new enough, long enough, and well cited with inline citations. Earwig shows 0.0% chance of plagiarism. A QPQ check shows you're good there too. I think where we're going to run into some trouble is on the hook facts. It's a nice idea to include some of the snippets from the informational poster to provide some social-personal background for the article, but I don't think it is a reliable enough source for a hook fact. The primary issue is that there's no attribution of authorship, either on the part of a person or an association. Unless that can be provided somehow, I think it might be better to take a fact from elsewhere in the article. One possibility that came to mind as I read the article was something like ... that the total production of the Saunders Creek mine was 853,100 tonnes? Yes, much more boring, but more of a reliable fact. — AJDS talk 15:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
I added this information to the article, and would like to suggest the following as a possible hook:

I like ALT2 and the info about the fossils. Georgialh (talk) 21:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

  • - Length, Date, Cite, QPQ exempt, and Earwigs check. ALT2 approved. Mifter (talk) 02:59, 15 March 2017 (UTC)