- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 12:35, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Sam Lek of Donwun
edit
- ... that Viceroy-General Sam Lek of Hanthawaddy retook Donwun with just 300 troops by employing the same ruse used by rebel forces to seize the town a year earlier? Source: (Pan Hla 2005: 57, 61)
- ALT1:... that Viceroy-General Sam Lek of Donwun was defeated by the forces of King Razadarit of Hanthawaddy after the viceroy was betrayed by his thwethauk brother? Source: (Pan Hla 2005: 172–173), (Fernquest 2006: 7); (Harvey 1925: 178) on the definition of thwethauk brother.
Created by Hybernator (talk). Self-nominated at 20:00, 17 November 2018 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
- Cited:
 - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
- Interesting:
|
Overall:
Article was new enough when nominated (6 days), is long enough (~5000 characters), and is thoroughly sourced, though largely to offline sources. The tone is appropriately neutral and encyclopedic. I don't see any issues with plagiarism, though I can't assess the offline sources. The first hook is interesting, assuming good faith on offline sources; ALT1 is supported by an online source but is less interesting. QPQ is done. This article is approved for DYK, with preference for the first hook.
Bryanrutherford0 (
talk) 16:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Article was new enough when nominated (6 days), is long enough (~5000 characters), and is thoroughly sourced, though largely to offline sources. The tone is appropriately neutral and encyclopedic. I don't see any issues with plagiarism, though I can't assess the offline sources. The first hook is interesting, assuming good faith on offline sources; ALT1 is supported by an online source but is less interesting. QPQ is done. This article is approved for DYK, with preference for the first hook. Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 16:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)