Template:Did you know nominations/Rupert Covered Bridge No. 56

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 02:38, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Rupert Covered Bridge No. 56 edit

Rupert Covered Bridge No. 56

5x expanded by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 02:59, 30 November 2014 (UTC).

  • New enough, long enough (more than fivefold expansion; from 425 to 2,664 characters, by my count), and free of any apparent policy issues (the article is neutral, well cited, and exhibits no instances of copyright violations or unnecessarily close paraphrasing). However, I do not have access to Brasch's book Columbia County Place Names, so I am accepting references to it in good faith. All the other references look great to me, though. All of the hook options are short enough and are cited in the article. Personally, I think that ALT2 is the most interesting, but I'd be fine with either of the other two. Also, QPQ has been done, and the chosen image is free (licensed under the CC-BY-SA-3.0), used in the article, and shows up well at small size. Bearing in mind that I am accepting one reference in good faith, everything looks good to me and I think this article is ready to go. Michael Barera (talk) 22:03, 3 December 2014 (UTC)