Template:Did you know nominations/Roesia si Pengkor
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 21:09, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Roesia si Pengkor edit
- ... that The Teng Chun was inspired by a Dutchman to target his film Roesia si Pengkor at native Indonesians?
- ALT1:... that Roesia si Pengkor was the first film by The Teng Chun targeted at native Indonesians?
- Reviewed: Slender catshark
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nominated at 14:22, 16 October 2013 (UTC).
Dates and lengths both good. Hook facts and about half the article referenced to off-line sources, so AGF. No problems found with plagiarism or close paraphrasing within the sections of the article referenced to on-line sources. --Allen3 talk 14:25, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The article doesn't mention that The Teng Chun was inspired by the Dutchman, nor that it was his first film targeted at native indonesians, making both hooks ineligible. Mentoz86 (talk) 09:34, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- I'm afraid you didn't read carefully enough. " The success of the earlier films (Dutchman Albert Balink's Terang Boelan among them) convinced him that it presented greater financial opportunities." and "Though his earlier works had been oriented at ethnic Chinese audiences, Roesia si Pengkor was targeted at the native population of the Indies." has a clear implication of the second hook. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 18:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- You might be correct that I didn't read it carefully enough, cause I thought you were talking about The's earlier films. Maybe change that sentance to "the success of Albert Balink films". When it comes to the second hook, that sentance doesn't actually state that it was the first film by The Teng Chun targeted at native Indonesian. Either way, shouldn't those two sentances have an inline citation, and not a citation at the end of the paragraph, per the DYK-guidelines? Mentoz86 (talk) 19:20, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- I've duplicated the reference. "his earlier works" does not have a qualifier, which means this indicates all of The's films, and thus the "first" is very clearly implicated. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:52, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
