- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
R. W. Symonds edit
- ... that Robert Symonds, expert in old English furniture, claimed that his girlfriend thrust a pair of curling tongs in his ear?
- ALT1:... that Robert Symonds was described as "the pre-eminent 20th century scholar and authority on English furniture"?
- Reviewed: Banksia alliacea
Created by Philafrenzy (talk). Self-nominated at 21:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
QPQ: 
- Not done
Overall: 
I prefer the first hook about the curling-tongs Andrew D. (talk) 00:22, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- QPQ done. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:02, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Article new enough, long enough, fully referenced. QPQ done. Hook and text verified against online sources. Picture in the article could be used to make it more interesting. I suggest using the OG hook. Good to go.BabbaQ (talk) 22:35, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Returned from prep for further work per discussion at WT:DYK#Prep 3. Yoninah (talk) 23:49, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- ALT2: ... that Robert Symonds, an acknowledged expert in old English furniture, was less successful with women, one of whom thrust a pair of curling tongs in his ear? Yoninah (talk) 23:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- I like it but have to point out that he was a young man at the time and didn't write his first book until after all this had happened. Also it's an unproven claim. ALT3: ... that Robert Symonds, expert in old English furniture, tried to expose the methods of the fakers? Philafrenzy (talk) 10:00, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- ALT4: ... that architect and expert in old English furniture Robert Symonds never acknowledged his son John, the literary executor of the satanist Aleister Crowley? Philafrenzy (talk) 11:02, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- ALT5: ... that Robert Symonds, expert in old English furniture, attempted to restore the reputation of the horologist Thomas Tompion? Philafrenzy (talk) 11:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- I wish I would have happened on this discussion when it was still at WT:DYK. I honestly think the first (pulled) hook is the best. It's just so weird. Second choice maybe to the Satanism one. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- I don't see why it can't be reinstated as long as it goes in the last slot which is traditionally reserved for the weird. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:32, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- I agree with above. This is just weird to remove a hook for that reason. BabbaQ (talk) 07:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Consensus is for reinstatement of the original hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- I agree with above. This is just weird to remove a hook for that reason. BabbaQ (talk) 07:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- I don't see why it can't be reinstated as long as it goes in the last slot which is traditionally reserved for the weird. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:32, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
