Template:Did you know nominations/Pseudomugil signifer
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Pseudomugil signifer edit
- ... that the Australian Pacific blue-eye was described from a specimen taken to Vienna?
Created by Casliber (talk). Self nominated at 12:32, 9 March 2015 (UTC).
Long enough (though not by much) -- can it be expanded? There appears to be a lot more material in some of the references. Date created is ok. Hook fact checks out in reliable source; hook is short enough & sufficiently attention grabbing. The article is neutral & appears stable. No close paraphrasing detected. QPQ completed. I found a few problems with the text; "common" in the pseudo-lead does not appear to be cited anywhere (seems covered in ref 3). "The elongate body and partly transparent and pale yellow or olive with a silver operculum and belly." seems to have been garbled. More wikilinks (eg to geographical features) would be helpful. Espresso Addict (talk) 06:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Ungarbled now. geo links added. expaded to 384 words now....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, this looks good. The only outstanding issue is the citation for it being common.Espresso Addict (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
