Template:Did you know nominations/Protection from Harassment Act 2014

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 15:14, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Protection from Harassment Act 2014

edit

Created by Mailer diablo (talk). Self-nominated at 21:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC).

  • The article is new and long enough, copyvio is unlikely as no close paraphrasing issues nor plagiarism detected, and QPQ is done. I think the second hook is more interesting, but I don't see it being mentioned on the article. Can you tell me where it is located, or edit the article again to add the hook with a reliable inline source? Thanks! :) 001Jrm (talk) 05:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the response. Definitely. " The Act is intended to cover both intentional and unintentional harassment, and has extra-territorial jurisdiction for certain offences which include online acts by the defendant if the complainant was in Singapore at the time of the offence and the defendant knew or should have known of that fact.[5]" For the given inline source (ref 5), part 4. - Mailer Diablo 16:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Oh, right. Saw it, thanks! Hook is interesting and has an inline source added on the article. I think ALT1 hook is good to go now! ^^ 001Jrm (talk) 23:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)