Template:Did you know nominations/Procedural impropriety in Singapore administrative law

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Procedural impropriety in Singapore administrative law

edit

Created by Beatriceyeo (talk), Ivanathanlee (talk), Jameswwm (talk), Keshayaysl (talk), Wz.gan.2011 (talk), Aliciatkh (talk), Elllfong (talk), Jasselynseet (talk), and Lovehappyweekend (talk). Nominated by Smuconlaw (talk) at 18:40, 18 July 2015 (UTC).

  • These two articles are new enough and long enough. The hook facts are the basis of the articles and have inline citations. The articles are neutral but the references are mostly offline so it is not possible for me to assess whether the precise legal language has any policy issues such as close paraphrasing. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)