Template:Did you know nominations/Ouster clause

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 22:43, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Ouster clause

edit
  • ... that in the UK a total ouster clause in a statute generally does not prevent a person from applying for judicial review of a public authority's decision, but a partial ouster clause does?

Created by Annexue (talk), Weilun.koh (talk). Nominated by Smuconlaw (talk) at 15:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC).

There's actually no need for a QPQ. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 05:08, 6 June 2013 (UTC)