Template:Did you know nominations/Natasha Wightman

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:48, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Natasha Wightman edit

5x expanded by Ruby2010 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC).

  • New enough, long enough, neutral, no detectable copyvios. Article is well sourced, except for the theatre paragraph, which needs to be sourced or removed. Both hooks are within the character limit and sourced, as well as being interesting... but the first hook seems a bit close to violating point five of the DYK hook content criteria, so I would go with ALT1, which is the more interesting one anyway. QPQ has been completed. Once the one issue I mentioned has been fixed, this will pass. G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 14:50, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks for reviewing! I have removed the unsourced theatre paragraph (theatre credits, especially for lesser known productions, can be difficult to find in online reliable sources unfortunately). I also prefer the alt hook (though I think criterion 5 points to the QPQ requirement, which was done here – were you perhaps thinking of one of the other criteria?) Thanks! Ruby 2010/2013 17:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Okay, this article is good to go. And the criterion I was referring to was point five of the "Content" subsection of WP:DYK#The hook, which reads "If the subject is a work of fiction or a fictional character, the hook must involve the real world in some way." Sorry if I wasn't clear. Anyway, nice article! Keep up the good work. G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 17:33, 13 March 2016 (UTC)