Template:Did you know nominations/Natasha Baker

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 15:14, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Natasha Baker

edit

Created/expanded by Basement12 (talk). Self nom at 15:50, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

  • I considered something similar but wasn't sure if anyone would deem that particularly unusual? - Basement12 (T.C) 18:44, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
It was my understanding that her controlling the horses with her voice was unique given her inability to use her legs. Every horse-riding I know uses their legs the majority of the time when guiding the horse. I mean I'm no expert but the highlight of this hook is either: 'She's found a unique way to control her horses in spite of her handicap' or 'The lady has no leg-muscles'. Second one seems a little unfair. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
I agree with you Panyd, the hook is about her unusual method of control. My initial thinking was that pointing out why it's unusual might make the hook more meaningful to those who don't have the background knowledge and may think it normal. Either the original or the Alt would be fine with me - Basement12 (T.C) 16:16, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Comment: To me, personally, the lack of leg strength makes it much more interesting. How about this?
Rnickel (talk) 13:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Anything happening with this nom here? How about this?
Too chatty, maybe? --PFHLai (talk) 16:22, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Perhaps a slight reordering of the above would connect it up better? How about:
I'll see whether Basement12 has any thoughts on these new ALTs. —BlueMoonset (talk) 15:57, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
All the ALT options seem to get the point across but for what it's worth my suggestion would be
  • Why is talked in scare quotes/direct quotes? It's not directly quoted in the article. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:31, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
  • One more go at influencing the consensus-- I think the interesting nugget here is, she can ride a horse, and even win medals, with a disability that would seem to make it impossible. Lots of people train animals to respond to voice commands, so I don't think focusing on that makes for a particularly interesting hook. If we're looking for punchiness, how about this?
--Rnickel (talk) 15:57, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
ALT6 only. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:10, 13 October 2012 (UTC)