Template:Did you know nominations/Natal red rock hare

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Natal red rock hare edit

Illustration of the Natal red rock hare by Geoffroy, 1832.
Illustration of the Natal red rock hare by Geoffroy, 1832.
  • ... that although the Natal red rock hare (pictured) drinks any available water, it is a water independent species as it obtains moisture from dew and food? Source: "Water independent, obtaining enough moisture from their food and from dew, but will drink when water is available" Schütze, Heike (2002). Field Guide to the Mammals of the Kruger National Park. Struik. p. 154. ISBN 9781868725946.
    • ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook"

5x expanded by Adityavagarwal (talk). Self-nominated at 14:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC).

  • 5x expanded in time, long enough, sourced, inline hook citation checks out, no apparent copyvios, QPQ done. Adityavagarwal, should it be "independent on water," or "independent of water" in the article? --Usernameunique (talk) 16:55, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
@Usernameunique: Thank you very much for your review again! Yeah, tweaked. Adityavagarwal (talk) 17:20, 2 September 2017 (UTC)