Template:Did you know nominations/Mikengreg, Solipskier, Gasketball

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:12, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Mikengreg, Solipskier, Gasketball edit

Mainspaced by Czar (talk). Self nominated at 13:22, 13 July 2014 (UTC).

  • OK, let's start at the beginning The following has been checked in this review by Matty.007
  • QPQs all done
  • Articles mainspaced by Czar on 6 July (first 2) and 8 July (Mikengreg), and nominated on 13 July (i.e. 7 days)
  • Article sizes in bytes are:
  • Solipskier: 6626
  • Gasketball: 6905
  • Mikengreg: 12,643
  • I will continue this review soon, but bear with me (large article*3). I will go through each article individually from now onwards. Thanks, Matty.007 15:57, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm afraid I haven't worked in videos, but this one seems quite long (4 minutes) for a main page thing and is quite repetative. If you want it approved, bearing in mind it may well not be used, I'm afraid you'll have to explain to me how it's fair use from YouTube, as I don't quite follow. Thanks, Matty.007 16:07, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Greg gets 59m high score in Solipskier.webm No one's obligated to watch the whole thing through the same way no one's obligated to click through the pictures or GIFs or whatnot. The video was released by the game's creator (see OTRS permission). czar  16:10, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
OK, so video good to go if wanted. Thanks, Matty.007 17:06, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • I think Mikengreg is OK: long enough, neutral, no copyvios in few spotchecks, so all looks good there. Thanks, Matty.007 16:05, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
@Matty.007, hey—just checking back in about the rest of the review czar  16:54, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, been off wiki for a few days. Solipskier is long enough, new enough, neutral, and no paraphrasing in spot checks, as is Gasketball. Sourcing is all good, I would quite like some negative reviews if you can, but nothing to hold up the nom. Hook fact is cited in article. Thanks, Matty.007 07:05, 4 August 2014 (UTC)