Template:Did you know nominations/Max-Liebling House
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Fuebaey (talk) 13:00, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Max-Liebling House edit
- ... that the Max-Liebling House will become a center for preservation of White City in Tel Aviv, the world's largest concentration of German Bauhaus architecture?
- ALT1 ... that Germany is funding preservation of the Max-Liebling House as a center for preservation of the world's largest concentration of German Bauhaus architecture, located in Tel Aviv, Israel?
Created by E.M.Gregory (talk). Self-nominated at 12:47, 13 July 2015 (UTC).
- eligible as regards newness, length, neutrality and citations: no apparent unacceptable paraphrasing.
- length - I make it about 150 characters short.
- hook - original length OK, alt 1 is a little too long - but I prefer the original anyway.
- QPQ - awaiting - or perhaps you don't need to do QPQ?
No at the moment, but you could revise to overcome the above comments.--Smerus (talk) 13:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- If the nominated article is too short, then the "X" icon should not be used; I think this one fits the issues better. Also, to avoid confusion, only a single summary icon should be used for the review, not an icon each for various aspects. I did a minor edit to help avoid one-sentence paragraphs and reduce the iterations of the house name; at the moment, according to DYKcheck, the article has 1294 prose characters, and requires at least 206 additional prose characters to achieve the 1500 minimum. A QPQ will not be required; the nominator has had only one nominated article appear on the main page to date. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:46, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I'll just leave the article as is. I could pad it, but I hate padded articles. It's useful as it is, a brief article that will grow as the program of restoring the architecturally significant neighborhood of which is is part progresses.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting us know, E.M.Gregory. I'm sorry this didn't work out for DYK, but glad you created the article. Marking the nomination for closure since the article is too short to qualify for DYK. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:47, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- eligible as regards newness, length, neutrality and citations: no apparent unacceptable paraphrasing.
