- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Maria Möller edit
Maria Möller
- ... that actress Maria Möller is a classically trained mezzo-soprano and soloist?
- Reviewed: IWGP Heavyweight Championship (IGF)
Created by BabbaQ (talk) and Werldwayd (talk). Nominated by BabbaQ (talk) at 12:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC).
By my count, the prose portion of this article is below the 1500 character minimum. If you expand it, I can review it for you, but it needs to first meet the length requirements. Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Notecardforfree: Thank you. I have expanded the article. Let me know what you think.BabbaQ (talk) 19:59, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
This article was created on October 14, it is over the 1500 character threshold, and there are no policy violations. The image used here is licensed via CC. The hook is under 200 characters and I will AGF that because Möller is primarily known for her work on stage, the fact that she is a classically trained vocalist is unusual and interesting. However, there are two issues that need to be addressed before this nomination can pass. The first is that the link to the source supporting this hook is dead. Can you fix the link? The second is that another editor has stated the QPQ used for this nomination does not meet minimum standards necessary for a review. Can you supply another QPQ? Also, you say that Möller is a "suffler." I'm not too familiar with all the jobs associated with the stage and theater, but I couldn't find a definition for what a "suffler" is. Can you clarify this? Thanks, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Notecardforfree:Julie Schwabe is an article that I reviewed and help review earlier on. I also added a new source.BabbaQ (talk) 17:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- The citation issue has been resolved, but the QPQ issue has not. The QPQ review for Julie Schwabe is almost identical to the one that was rejected by BlueMoonset. A new QPQ is needed bfore this nomination can be approved. Thanks, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 22:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I see. Lets try with Anibal Escalante. @Notecardforfree: BabbaQ (talk) 16:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- BabbaQ. The new review is functionally equivalent to the one that was rejected by BlueMoonset. I don't want to undermine BlueMoonset's judgment in this matter, so I think it may be best to start a new review and use that as your QPQ. Thanks, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Notecardforfree it was approved and if there had been any problems with that qpq it would have been raised at the time.BabbaQ (talk) 17:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Alright, fair enough I have made a new review on Ioan Missir.BabbaQ (talk) 17:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks again for your understanding with this, BabbaQ. The the review for Ioan Missir discusses all relevant criteria. Now that the QPQ issue has been settled, this hook is good to go. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 17:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Alright, fair enough I have made a new review on Ioan Missir.BabbaQ (talk) 17:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Notecardforfree it was approved and if there had been any problems with that qpq it would have been raised at the time.BabbaQ (talk) 17:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- BabbaQ. The new review is functionally equivalent to the one that was rejected by BlueMoonset. I don't want to undermine BlueMoonset's judgment in this matter, so I think it may be best to start a new review and use that as your QPQ. Thanks, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
