- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Marc Bloch edit
Marc Bloch
- ...that Marc Bloch (pictured) has been described as both "the greatest historian of modern times" and as a flawed visionary? Source: Stirling, K. (2007). "Rereading Marc Bloch: The Life and Works of a Visionary Modernist". History Compass. 5, p.525 and p.535 respectively.
- ALT1:...that Marc Bloch (pictured)—one of the most influential historians of the 20th century—was also a French Resistance fighter and shot by the Gestapo in 1944? Source: As above for the "influential2, and Fink, C. (1995). "Marc Bloch (1886–1944)". In Damico H. Zavadil J. B. Medieval Scholarship: Biographical Studies on the Formation of a Discipline: History. London: Routledge, p.209 for his death.
- ALT2:...that French historian Marc Bloch (pictured) fought in both the First and Second World Wars, in the latter both in the army and as a Resistance fighter? Source:Hughes-Warrington, M. (2015). Fifty Key Thinkers on History (3rd ed.). London: Routledge, p.12, for WWI; for WWII, Fink, C. (1998). "Marc Bloc and the Drôle de Guerre: Prelude to the "Strange Defeat"". In Blatt, J. The French Defeat of 1940: Reassessments. New York: Berghahn Books, p.42; for resistance, see above.
- ALT3:
...that there are a fucking tonne of potential hooks about Marc Bloch (pictured), so if anyone has any better ideas, feel free to suggest. But per WP:READER, let's try and keep it interesting...Source: Me.
5x expanded by Serial Number 54129 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:51, 18 December 2018 (UTC).
Gulp! Massive expansion, presumably from sandbox. Seems neutral & very high quality. Earwig finds nothing, QPQ done. Not that it matters, but isn't it 17 not 18 December? Also many paras are much too long. Original & ALTs 1& 2 all ok - ALT1 might be hookiest. Great job anyway, should pass GA as is. GTG. Johnbod (talk) 03:05, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Johnbod: yeah, it was moved from a sandbox to mainspace here. Sorry for not clarifying that. Thanks for the support though; yes, I intend to seek some form of promotion for this in future. I should probably make more of an effort to attend more south London FA-writing workshops ;) indeed, the paragraphs are *ahem* solid—I'm sure it'll get addressed at peer review or somewhere!BTW, what d'you mean about the date? Cheers, ——SerialNumber54129 14:46, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
