Template:Did you know nominations/María Carmen Rubio
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 12:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
María Carmen Rubio
edit- ... that Spanish archer María Carmen Rubio had difficulty getting funding for the 2012 Paralympics qualifier of poor performances by other archers at previous year's world championships?
- Reviewed: French battleship Charlemagne
Moved to mainspace by LauraHale (talk). Self nominated at 13:13, 2 December 2013 (UTC).
- "funding for the 2012 Paralympics qualifier of poor performances by other archers" - Wakey-wakey, Laura! "After"? Johnbod (talk) 22:04, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- There is no citation directly after the hook and the two closest references do not support the hook unless I am missing something. EricEnfermero HOWDY! 11:02, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Nowhere does the article state that the funding issues were for the 2012 Paralympics qualifier, just for a London qualifier. (It may have been the qualifier for the 2012 Paralympics, but this is not made clear and must be.) Under the circumstances of the problematic hook and lack of clarity in the article, I strongly recommend that the author carefully review both. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
It's been over a week, and the nominator has made close to 900 edits, including two to this article, though these edits merely added new facts rather than addressing the raised issues. Also, in that period, another five articles have been identified as having significant issues. Laura, you've been a DYK contributor for a long time and you know how this works—if you want to concentrate on creating new material at the expense of fixing what you've already created and nominated, that's your choice, but it's one that is not compatible with DYK. Closing this nomination for failing to meet DYK standards. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:35, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
