- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 02:38, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Mündig edit
- ... that Mündig (pictured) never competed on a racecourse prior to winning the 1835 Derby Stakes, and bookmakers were misled to lengthen his odds based on false information fed to them by his trainer?
Created/expanded by Tigerboy1966 (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 19:11, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Date, length, sources, hook and image are all fine. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:23, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Same question as an above nom, what makes Bloodlines.net reliable? Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:49, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- The Bloodlines.net site may or may not be reliable but the information for the hook and the rest of the article is not from there but comes from contemporaneous sources. Horse information dating back nearly two centuries is probably sparse and difficult to verify. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:10, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Considering it is only used to support the family tree, I guess it is okay. However, if the reference is to be commonly used it would be nice to have indication of its reliability. Tick based on previous review. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
