Template:Did you know nominations/Long Run (Cranberry Creek)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 07:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Long Run (Cranberry Creek) edit
- ... that Long Run is just a half mile long?
Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 01:43, 9 March 2015 (UTC).
New, long enough, well cited, within policy, I changed the phrase of hook to make it more interesting, and QPQ is given. Just remove the red-links and it's good to go. Thanks. --Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 04:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Captain Assassin!: Unless I'm deeply mistaken, it's only the hook that can't have redlinks. The article can (and should IMO) have them. --Jakob (talk) 10:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- If you are not going to create those pages soon, then you should have removed those. --Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 10:40, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Captain Assassin!: There is no rule that says that articles may not have redlinks. WP:REDYES. Even FA doesn't forbid redlinks, so I don't see why DYK would. --Jakob (talk) 10:59, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
I'm not saying it's a rule. I'm just saying it'd be better to remove if you are not willing to create those. Though everything is fine. --Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 11:02, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
