Template:Did you know nominations/London Forum (far-right group)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:52, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

London Forum (far-right group)

  • ... that the London Forum, a British far-right organization, was described by an anti-fascist magazine as "[bridging] the fascist and Tory right"? Source: "Searchlight - about". We are the only publication regularly to investigate and analyse the far right's ideological powerhouse, the New Right, and to expose the groups that bridge the fascist and Tory right such as the London Forum and Traditional Britain Group.
    • ALT1: ... that a British far-right group, the London Forum, has brought together neo-Nazis, Holocaust deniers, anti-Semites, and other prominent members of the British far-right? Source: Childs, Simon; Poulter, James (12 March 2018). "The Neo-Nazi Home of the UK Alt-Right". Vice. Some of the most controversial far-right speakers from around the world have addressed forum meetings. Regular speakers include David Irving, the notorious Holocaust denier; veteran British fascist Richard Edmonds of the National Front (NF); and Alex Davies, one of the founders of banned Nazi terror gang National Action (NA). Talks in the past have been on topics such as "National Socialism and the Green Movement," "Straightening out the White Man's thinking," and "Was Jesus a Nazi?"

Improved to GA status by AFreshStart (talk). Self-nominated at 14:07, 16 November 2021 (UTC).

  • The hook is highly interesting and properly cited in the article, which is covered by relatively acceptable sources, has a passable Copyvio score, more than suitable size and has been brought to GA recently enough. However, I cannot tick this until you fix the nom by changing created/expanded to improve to GA status, especially since the article was nominated on the same day as this promotion. --K. Peake 08:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Good to go now, you fixed the nom properly; well done for an amateur! K. Peake 09:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Promoting to Prep 6Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:52, 19 November 2021 (UTC)