Template:Did you know nominations/Little Black Creek

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:28, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Little Black Creek

edit

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 02:54, 1 December 2014 (UTC).

  • The article is new enough and long enough, and the hook is cited in the article. It seems to be neutrally written and there is clearly not a copyvio (since the only similar phrase is the name of the journals cited). [1] There are plenty of inline citations, and the hook is correctly formatted. Thus, this looks good to go to me! Everymorning talk to me 23:30, 1 December 2014 (UTC)