Template:Did you know nominations/List of local nature reserves in Somerset

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 14:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

List of local nature reserves in Somerset edit

Created by Rodw (talk). Self-nominated at 20:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC).

  • New enough, long enough, meets core content policies. However, the hook is not cited. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 01:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
    • The area are cited by the entry for each site. It is not normal to add citations in the lead when they are cited further down the list.— Rod talk 05:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
    • Could you point out what you consider to be close paraphrasing? Looking at the link you have given there are no more than a few words the same - generally the title of organisations.— Rod talk 05:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
      • Most of these are wp mirror sites.— Rod talk 10:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
        • I see that the CP really comes from a mirror, so never mind that. I still can't find anything about the area in the cited source, though. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 11:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
          • If you look in the table for the smallest "Wellington Basins" and as it says in note A go to the map then use the "i" button to click on the shaded area when it will show you the area. The same process can be used for Weston Wood - the largest. Would it be easier just to have an alt:
          • Or some alternative hook, if you (or anyone else) can think of one.— Rod talk 12:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
            • @Jakec: Friendly ping. Care to finish off this review? Fuebaey (talk) 19:22, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
              • The original is fine, I guess. Sorry that I forgot about this for so long. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 01:33, 9 October 2015 (UTC)