Template:Did you know nominations/List of accolades received by Sense and Sensibility (film)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk)

List of accolades received by Sense and Sensibility (film) edit

(edit nomination page)

Created by Ruby2010 (talk). Self nom at 00:50, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Article checks out, and I think that ALT is slightly better, but happy to go with the choice of whoever moves this to the draft section. I double checked the article against the main movie article as well and found that the relevent sextion prior to Ruby2010's work was simply a text based list and so qualifies under the 5x expansion rules as well. Nice work, hope you're planning to work it up to an FL. Miyagawa (talk) 12:19, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review. I used the DYK tool on the film article, and it still indicates it is not 5x expanded. I wondered if the tool is inaccurate, or doesn't account for certain factors (like lists). I'd be happy to nominate the article for DYK if I can. Ruby2010 comment! 14:48, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I meant that list article can be considered a 5x expansion of the old section on the original film article, as when there are content splits such as this, it's required to be a 5x expansion of the old content. As for the film article, you'd need to make it massively larger in order to qualify for DYK. Before your work it was 8293 characters - which would require an increase to 41465 characters (it's currently at 14121). Miyagawa (talk) 20:54, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Ah, I see. Thanks for the clarification! (Glad I'm not crazy for misreading DYK tool). :) Ruby2010 comment! 23:04, 17 August 2011 (UTC)