- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:51, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Lin Yining edit
- ... that Qing dynasty poet Lin Yining was part of the "Banana Garden Five"?
- ALT1:... that neither of Lin Yining's children dared to take up her craft?
Created by Kingoflettuce (talk). Self-nominated at 08:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, hook cited here and in the article. Prefer the first of the two. QPQ done. Hook accepted in good faith as the source is in print (the Google Books preview omits the applicable page). Good to go. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 18:36, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but notice that the QPQ was not complete. Please see there. Yoninah (talk) 21:01, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: My mistake. Thought the QPQ was there. I must have been seeing things... --Bcschneider53 (talk) 23:17, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Bcschneider53: @Yoninah: The QPQ is there, there's no need to be boring and explicitly list down the five criteria all the time. I do not believe it is dictated by policy either -- more like a personal preference. The lack of issues raised means I am okay with all aspects of the article. However, since you insist, I shall be on my way... Happy now? Kingoflettuce (talk) 03:59, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
For the convenience of others my original QPQ was " 
Pretty neat article, new and long enuf (well certainly past 1500 chars despite DYKcheck being buggy for me), so well done! (Would be good if the actual article had some images and more categories but that's besides the point). AGF on the plot and all." which in fact hits all the vital spots. "not complete" lol Kingoflettuce (talk) 04:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Kingoflettuce: Please see this policy: WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria – 5. Review requirement (QPQ): For every nomination you make you must review one other nomination (unrelated to you)—this is called quid pro quo or QPQ. The review must address all five criteria listed here.
- Thank you for adding the neutrality and close paraphrasing checks to your original review. Restoring tick per Bcschneider53's review. Yoninah (talk) 12:03, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
- You are most welcome. Kingoflettuce (talk) 13:53, 2 July 2017 (UTC)