Template:Did you know nominations/Leonie ter Braak

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 20:56, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Leonie ter Braak

Created by Simeon (talk). Self-nominated at 11:56, 14 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Leonie ter Braak; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: No - just a problem.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: @Simeon: Good article. Though, the hook should probably say dutch language since according the The Marriage Escape article "It was also the third best visited film in the Netherlands in 2020, with 1917 and Tenet in first and second place respectively." Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:24, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

@Onegreatjoke: Thanks! I think Dutch-language would not apply in this case as the film is mostly spoken in Tweants dialect and that article states that "A widespread misconception is the assumption that it is a variety of Dutch. It is a variety of Dutch Low Saxon, ...". It should really be about being a film of Dutch origin. Would the phrase "made her film debut in the best visited film of Dutch origin of 2020" work? Simeon (talk) 21:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
I think it's fine. Though, wikilinking the best visited film in the hook would be good as well. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:52, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Thanks, I have updated the hook and I have added a link to "best visited film". Simeon (talk) 17:57, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
@Simeon and Onegreatjoke: Unfortunately the article does not qualify right now with 1376 characters. WP:DYK#2. Bruxton (talk) 15:50, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
@Bruxton: Thanks for checking, I have now expanded the article with additional content and it should now be 1,500+ characters. - Simeon (talk) 18:20, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
@Onegreatjoke: since the article doubled in size, can you do a review of the new material? Bruxton (talk) 18:39, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Still seems good. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:41, 26 May 2023 (UTC)