Template:Did you know nominations/Le Nove porcelain

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:49, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Le Nove porcelain edit

(

)

Le Nove porcelain bowl, 1765-70

... that the samples of Le Nove porcelain sent to the Venetian government in 1762 supporting a licence application may actually have been made by another factory? Source: Lanaro, Paola, At the Centre of the Old World: Trade and Manufacturing in Venice and on the Venetian Mainland (1400-1800), 2006, Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies, Victoria University (Toronto, Ont.), ISBN 0772720312, 9780772720313
- ALT1:... that William Ewart Gladstone owned pieces of Le Nove porcelain, from near Venice? Source: Chaffers, William, Marks and Monograms on Pottery and Porcelain, 1874 edition, online, page 433

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Stele of Arniadas

Created by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 16:22, 20 June 2019 (UTC).

Reviewing ... Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:01, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Interesting article! Nit-picks: I'd add the year to the hook to give bit of context; since Favaro cites his sources for the hook fact, I'd be inclined to add those as citations; presumably "Parolin period" not "Parotin period"? Oh, and were the Cinque Savi really a part of the government of the Republic, or of the city administration (I know I don't know)? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:59, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. "Parolin", yes, oops! See here re the Cinque Savi - pretty clear they cover the whole republic, & of course Nove isn't actually in the city. I think one of the characteristics of the R of V was that, given their history, there was barely any distinction between "a part of the government of the Republic" and "the city administration". Date added to hook - same source. I'll deal with the rest later; too sunny just now! Johnbod (talk) 14:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC)