Template:Did you know nominations/La Follette-Bulwinkle Act

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Yoninah (talk) 23:20, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Does not meet minimum 1500 character count

La Follette-Bulwinkle Act edit

Created by Jphill19 (talk). Nominated by Iazyges (talk) at 19:39, 10 October 2016 (UTC).

  • The article is new enough and properly sourced, but at 1,407 characters of prose (which excludes text in lists) it's short of the minimum. @Jphill19: Alansohn (talk) 03:02, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Given that the article has just been tagged as a stub by its creator, Jphill19, and it remains too short, this nomination appears to be in trouble. DYK submissions are not supposed to be stubs. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:31, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Iazyges, what's the status of this nomination? As Alansohn noted, this article is below the 1500 character minimum. Additionally, there are a number sentences that are not substantiated by inline citations. Please advise how you would like to proceed. Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 11:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Article is still below the DYK minimum length, marked as a stub by its creator, and no action has been taken on it in the month since it was reviewed. Marking nomination for closure. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:00, 27 November 2016 (UTC)