- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 09:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Klein's line edit
- ... that Klein's line, the first tool to diagnose slipping of the ball-joint-like end of the femur in adolescents early to prevent destruction of the hip joint, is still used today?
5x expanded by Mschamberlain (talk) and Wuerzele (talk). Nominated by Wuerzele (talk) at 17:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC).
5x expanded on July 8th and long enough and neutral. It would be nice if some of the sources used the cite journal template, but that's my personal preference and not required for DYK. The information in the hook is in the pubmed source, assuming that 2009 is recent enough to be still used today. I don't see a QPQ though--did either of you review a DYK recently you could use for the QPQ? Also it looks like the image comes from an education website; I can't tell if their material is copyrighted but I would assume it is--do you have more information on its copyright status? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Rachel I never took the allowed self nominations without review that one can start with, maybe one or two? point me to where QPQ is checked/accounted for. the other person was the stub creator, not expander - I dont know how to delineate that in the template that asks for creator/expander. Re copyright: look at the image file and see for yourself the info I uploaded: It is NOT COPYRIGHTED. Copyrighted files dont survive on WP. Here is the exact email I received :
- Quia Support <help@quia.com> Jul 11 at 4:04 PM
- To user wuerzele
- Thank you for contacting Quia.
- Content the is created on Quia is considered in the public domain, so you are free to use that particular image.
- If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to help.
- Sincerely,
- Randy, Quia Support, help@quia.com
- I hope this helps.I have no idea how to fix the image format in the DYK template and was hoping for suggestions.Wuerzele (talk) 01:05, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. If you 5x expand an article for DYK, I don't think you have to credit the original page creator.
- I did look at the image file--I just didn't see the same information on the Quia website. Thanks for providing that additional information.
- For QPQ, usually there's a spot in the template to link to the name of the article whose DYK nomination you reviewed. In Template:NewDYKnomination it's the "reviewed" parameter--you write the name of the page there, and it links to it so a reviewer like me can view the page's DYK nomination to verify. If it's one of your first five DYK nominations, it's not required, but there isn't an easy way that I know of to see that. Is this one of your first 5 DYK nominations, or have you reviewed another DYK nomination? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:04, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
I looked at your contribution history and I understand what you're saying now about the DYK nominations. It looks like this will be your third? So QPQ is not required. Thanks for contributing to DYK! Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:10, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- I hope this helps.I have no idea how to fix the image format in the DYK template and was hoping for suggestions.Wuerzele (talk) 01:05, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
