Template:Did you know nominations/Kath Fox

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:14, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Kath Fox edit

  • Reviewed: Vickers Valiant
  • Comment: Ref 1 is a paywall source, but many of you have HighBeam through this project. Ref 2 is archived and accessible above.

Created by Raintheone (talk). Self-nominated at 20:05, 28 May 2018 (UTC).


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: dawnleelynn(talk) 23:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Raintheone Just one note that the hook text says the actress doesn't believe there are any more stories for her;. This: "The hook fact(s) must be stated in the article, and must be immediately followed by an inline citation to a reliable source." This is only implied in the article, not actually stated, but I'm passing the article. You might tweak the article though. Everything looks great though. Passing. I did have to add the hook citation to a couple sentences, though. Also, I believe both hooks are equally interesting. Hook ALT1 provides some text before paywell hits that supports it, take the rest on good faith. dawnleelynn(talk) 23:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC)