Template:Did you know nominations/KSJU (Minnesota)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 14:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

KSJU (Minnesota)

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that after KSJU radio was forced off FM and onto a cable system, students at the College of Saint Benedict could not listen to it on campus, even though their activity fees supported it? Several articles attest to the lack of service on CSB's campus between 1988 and 1993

• Reviewed: Japan National Route 280

Created by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 03:18, 13 September 2019 (UTC).

• ✔️New enough: created 02:26, 12 September 2019‎. ✔️Long enough: Prose=~3638. ✔️Within policy: is neutral, in-line cited, and 0% copyvio on Earwig. ✔️Hook is 185 characters and formatted well. ❌Hook not cited in template, above. ❌Article citation: does not mention students not being able to listen to it, nor the cable system. If that's not the citation, what is? ✔️Hook interesting to broad audience. ✔️Hook is neutral and not about BLP. ✔️QPQ: did {{Did you know nominations/Japan National Route 280}}. ✔️No image issues. Nessie (talk) 16:47, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

• @NessieVL: "CSB already sacrifices money to KSJU; yet is unable to receive KSJU under the current system." That's the quote. The cable part comes from here. I've added another citation that's even clearer. Raymie (t • c) 17:41, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

• Looks good to me. Not sure if you need to swap out the "Several articles attest..." text above to an actual reference though. Nessie (talk) 17:55, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

• There's no real need to, though the idea behind it is to have people thinking about their hook sources. It doesn't appear on the Main Page and was only added to the nomination template a couple of years ago. Raymie (t • c) 18:42, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

• @NessieVL: it really doesn't matter if the hook source is on the nomination template. Reviewers must check that the hook fact is cited in the article itself. Yoninah (talk) 14:22, 20 September 2019 (UTC)