Template:Did you know nominations/Jorge Triana Tena

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 18:56, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Jorge Triana Tena edit

  • Reviewed: Kyle Holbrook
  • Comment: Effectively a total rewrite of the article has occurred. In September 2015 an IP greatly expanded the article, but entirely in Spanish, replacing a stub in English with 218 characters of readable prose. The current readable prose count is 2,630. It is not a 5x expansion to the revision in Spanish but it is to the one in English. Surprisingly there is no matching article on eswiki, either!

5x expanded by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 20:53, 6 July 2016 (UTC).

  • Some issues found.
    • This article was not created or 5x expanded within the past 7 days. This article has been expanded from 1864 characters to 2637 chars of readable prose since 08:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC), a 1.41-fold expansion, 6683 short of a 5x expansion. See above, this is an unusual case that will trip the bot Raymie (tc) 02:25, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 2637 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • The probability of copyright violation is 1.0%. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 01:29, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

  • I agree with Raymie that this article should qualify for DYK as a complete rewrite of an article that someone had misguidedly expanded in Spanish. With this in mind, the article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts have inline citations and the article is neutral. The sources are in Spanish so I was unable to check for close paraphrasing. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)