Template:Did you know nominations/John Andrews (footballer born 1978)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 21:40, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

John Andrews (footballer born 1978)

edit
  • Reviewed: Hisyah
  • Comment: Reference (no 13) is in Icelandic, but I will be happy to translate for the reviewer if required. Also, I think there's probably a better way of wording the hook, if anyone can come up with something better that would be great.

Created/expanded by BigDom (talk). Self nom at 09:42, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

  • QPQ done. Article is fully supported by inline citations. Hook is properly formatted. Article is neutral enough. [1] [2] [3] No plagiarism concerns. Hook is supported by article, which is supported by source. No images to check. New enough and long enough.
  • Icelandic sources not plagiarised and support text.
  • Cannot verify the first source. My computer says it has maliciousness. (Wants to install bad software. Blocks me.) Ditto with second source. --LauraHale (talk) 10:39, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Find alternative sources for one and two. --LauraHale (talk) 10:39, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Thanks for the review. This is really weird, the links aren't working for me now either but they were fine last night when I wrote the article. For some reason, it seems the whole website has since been shut down. I'll try and sort it out. BigDom 10:47, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
  • OK, by a huge stroke of luck it turns out both pages had been archived by the Wayback Machine so I've linked to the archived versions. Do they work for you now? BigDom 11:00, 8 July 2012 (UTC)


Problem links fixed and information now verifiable. Manual check of sources shows no plagiarism from these. Good to go. --LauraHale (talk)