Template:Did you know nominations/Jennifer Lawrence filmography
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Cowlibob (talk) 17:45, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Jennifer Lawrence filmography
edit
Lawrence at the 2013 San Diego Comic-Con International
- ... that Jennifer Lawrence (pictured) has been recognised as the highest-grossing action heroine of all time by the Guinness World Records?
- ALT1: ... that Jennifer Lawrence (pictured) is the highest-grossing action heroine of all time?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Felt (film)
Created/expanded by Krish! (talk). Self-nominated at 11:20, 22 May 2016 (UTC).
Expansion length and date fine. Image is under a suitible license and the citations, including one for the hook, are fine. However, I see 7 dyks for @Krish!: so I think a QPQ is required please - Basement12 (T.C) 14:12, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- There are currently two opposes including my own at its Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Jennifer Lawrence filmography/archive1 relating to it being a contentfork. I hope these concerns are considered and properly addressed before this DYK nomination progresses. Cowlibob (talk) 15:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Cowlibob: Opposes on a featured list nomination aren't relevant to this process. If it were to be nominated for deletion (which I assume is what you are hinting at with your comment in that discussion) that becomes a different matter - Basement12 (T.C) 15:53, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- It wouldn't be outright deleted as I'm sure in the future when her career is more substantive it can become a list but it could potentially be reverted back to a redirect to Jennifer Lawrence as it was previously, in the near future. I just don't want to see a potential contentfork on the main page, leading to a redirect. It was only a consideration, if it's irrelevant to DYK, please disregard my comment. Cowlibob (talk) 16:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- DYK should only feature entries worth standalone articles rather than redirects, so I wouldn't [yet] approve of this nom if the article is redirected to her main bio Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- @SNUGGUMS:, @Cowlibob: You are correct but as yet I don't see any attempt to get the article changed to a redirect - just a few oppose votes on a featured list nom. Unless an AfD/merge discussion/etc. is started it isn't going to magically change. Of course if this does occur the DYK nom will be pulled and no one will promote it to the queue (and then main page) without checking this. As it is the nomination hasn't yet been approved anyway as it is awaiting the QPQ reuirement from the nominator - Basement12 (T.C) 22:16, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Basement12 QPQ done. Krish | Talk 10:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- @SNUGGUMS:, @Cowlibob: You are correct but as yet I don't see any attempt to get the article changed to a redirect - just a few oppose votes on a featured list nom. Unless an AfD/merge discussion/etc. is started it isn't going to magically change. Of course if this does occur the DYK nom will be pulled and no one will promote it to the queue (and then main page) without checking this. As it is the nomination hasn't yet been approved anyway as it is awaiting the QPQ reuirement from the nominator - Basement12 (T.C) 22:16, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- DYK should only feature entries worth standalone articles rather than redirects, so I wouldn't [yet] approve of this nom if the article is redirected to her main bio Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- It wouldn't be outright deleted as I'm sure in the future when her career is more substantive it can become a list but it could potentially be reverted back to a redirect to Jennifer Lawrence as it was previously, in the near future. I just don't want to see a potential contentfork on the main page, leading to a redirect. It was only a consideration, if it's irrelevant to DYK, please disregard my comment. Cowlibob (talk) 16:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Cowlibob: Opposes on a featured list nomination aren't relevant to this process. If it were to be nominated for deletion (which I assume is what you are hinting at with your comment in that discussion) that becomes a different matter - Basement12 (T.C) 15:53, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- There are currently two opposes including my own at its Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Jennifer Lawrence filmography/archive1 relating to it being a contentfork. I hope these concerns are considered and properly addressed before this DYK nomination progresses. Cowlibob (talk) 15:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
QPQ now done and all DYK rules met but I recommend waiting to see the outcome of the article being merged back in to the main Jennifer Lawrence article- Basement12 (T.C) 11:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- A discussion on the deletion/redirection is now ongoing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Lawrence filmography - Basement12 (T.C) 10:24, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The article has now been merged/redirected to Jennifer Lawrence#Filmography so can't be used at this time - Basement12 (T.C) 10:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- A discussion on the deletion/redirection is now ongoing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Lawrence filmography - Basement12 (T.C) 10:24, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
