- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:37, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Promoted by Cwmhiraeth on 05:56, 16 July 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Jamie Porter edit
- ... that cricketer Jamie Porter was previously a recruitment consultant?
- ALT1:... that Jamie Porter took a wicket with his fifth delivery in first-class cricket?
- Comment: Expanded from a few lines to 1600 characters (>1500 characters, and over 5x)
5x expanded by Joseph2302 (talk). Self-nominated at 21:42, 4 July 2015 (UTC).
Article is just long enough at 1,566 characters and has been expanded 5x within past week. Content is neutral with no BLP issues and is well-cited with online citations to various reliable sources in a References section. Both suggested hooks are immediately cited as required. No obvious copyvio or close paraphrasing. QPQ not required as only one previous DYK. No image involved in article or DYK. Hooks are both correctly formatted. Good to go for DYK.
- My own preference is for the ALT1 hook, but both would work ok. The word "delivery" in ALT1 might be a bit obscure to the non-cricket reader, so I am going to suggest this;
- ALT2:... that Jamie Porter took a wicket with the fifth ball he bowled in first-class cricket?
- Sure, ALT2 seems fine to me, as it's simpler for non-cricket fans. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:57, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
