Template:Did you know nominations/James Tissot

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 15:12, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

James Tissot

Improved to Good Article status by Orchastrattor (talk). Self-nominated at 17:27, 9 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/James Tissot; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: No - a little too long for me.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: @Orchastrattor: Good article. Though, i feel like the hook is too long. It's nearly over 200 characters and so, if you can find a way to shorten the hook a bit i'd appreciate it. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:36, 10 June 2023 (UTC) @Onegreatjoke: Done Orchastrattor (talk) 02:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Guess it's fine. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:41, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
It is easier for promotors when the hook is represented and easy to find in the body of our article. Our hook hear uses different language and requires the reader to ferret out the details. I was able to piece it together so I hope that the queue promotor can do so as well. Bruxton (talk) 15:08, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Note: The 93% Earwig score is as a result of copy paste from Wikipedia. Bruxton (talk) 15:12, 20 June 2023 (UTC)