Template:Did you know nominations/Jürgen Hinzpeter

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Jürgen Hinzpeter

5x expanded by Jirangmoon (talk). Self-nominated at 09:08, 11 December 2019 (UTC).

  • The expansion is new enough but falls a little short of a five-fold expansion. Mackensen (talk) 00:50, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
  • @Piotrus: I went by bytes, and when I looked on the 13th it was just short, but it's been further expanded since then. Will review. Mackensen (talk) 22:15, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Article is long enough and expansion verified. The main text is cited throughout and appears to be free of close paraphrasing; this is difficult to verify against German- and Korean-language sources which are accepted in good faith. The hook is verified and of reasonable length. No QPQ required for this nomination as it appears to be the editor's first. Mackensen (talk) 22:23, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote this, and first edited and reorganized the presentation. I also added some English-language refs, so I've probably made myself ineligible for promoting this. It would be nice to mention his wife in a "Personal life" section. However, the hook is inaccurate. He asked to be buried in Gwangju; others suggested the National Cemetery. It might be hooky to say his nail clippings and hair were buried there. Yoninah (talk) 00:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Proposing ALT1 based on Yoninah's revisions, will need to be reviewed: "... that despite his wishes, only small parts of German journalist Jürgen Hinzpeter were buried in Gwangju? Mackensen (talk) 00:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
  • @Yoninah: Certainly. The hook is interesting while remaining...appropriate...and is verified in sources. Mackensen (talk) 20:31, 11 January 2020 (UTC)