Template:Did you know nominations/It’s a girl: The three deadliest words in the world
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 08:42, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
It’s a girl: The three deadliest words in the world edit
- ... that It's a Girl: The Three Deadliest Words in the World is a documentary about female infanticide?
Created/expanded by Darkness Shines (talk). Self nominated at 17:53, 17 November 2013 (UTC).
Long enough, new enough for expansion, sources check out fine, good to go; I took the liberty of italicizing the title, as it's a documentary film. ZappaOMati 01:19, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
This is a nit, but if it is on the front page it matters: I don't think the apostrophe in the title is the right character (see MOS:'). Also, "by Webster's" in the ELs is misleading as it leads the reader to conclude it is Webster's Dictionary, which it is not. — Brianhe (talk) 09:26, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Fixed the link to WU. RE MOS, the curly apostrophe is in the title, and is not about to be confused with wiki markup, so it is fine. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:49, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- The reasons for using the straight apostrophe have absolutely nothing to do with wiki markup. Please read WP:PUNC, especially the section Reasons to prefer straight quotation marks and apostrophes (and double quotation marks). The article should be moved, and the apostrophe should be fixed here and in the article. And, while the article is being moved, shouldn't the appropriate words be capitalized, since it's a film title? MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 20:39, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- ^Moved, curly is staying. Darkness Shines (talk) 23:12, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Would like someone to take a look at everything now that the article has been moved and the above issues appear to have been settled, and restore approval if appropriate. This has been sitting too long. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
