Template:Did you know nominations/Initial IMO Strategy on the reduction of GHG emissions from ships

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 06:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Initial IMO Strategy on the reduction of GHG emissions from ships

(

)

... that the Initial IMO Strategy on the reduction of GHG emissions from ships envisions the elimination of greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transport by the end of the century? Source: [1]
- ALT1:... that the International Maritime Organization created the Initial IMO Strategy on the reduction of GHG emissions from ships to fill a gap in the Paris Agreement, which did not cover maritime transport? Source: [2]

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/La Folia Barockorchester
Comment: I would like this to perhaps go up on 31 October, the opening of the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference.

Created by Chipmunkdavis (talk). Self-nominated at 16:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Everything looks great. I noticed the QPQ review is ongoing, so I'll watch that review and will change the status to Y when it's done. Please remind me if I forget or if that review drags on long enough to cause a traffic jam for this one. Requested date of October 31 is within the normal six-week window. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 18:25, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: does a review have to be closed/approved before the QPQ requirement is passed? I thought it was just an initial complete review. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 00:27, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Having been pinged, I note that CMD did complete their review to the point of approving the nomination, which is certainly sufficient for the QPQ requirement, even if the nomination is still open over subsequent hook disagreements. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Perfect. I've changed the QPQ to Y. I think we're all good to go here. Cheers, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 01:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

ALT0 to T:DYK/P3