Template:Did you know nominations/Improper Solicitation and Graft Act

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:09, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Improper Solicitation and Graft Act edit

  • ... that the South Korea's Improper Solicitation and Graft Act makes gifts to officials of more than ~45 USD a criminal offence? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
    • ALT1:.. that the South Korea Improper Solicitation and Graft Act counts private teachers and journalists among the ranks of public officials? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self-nominated at 14:48, 21 November 2016 (UTC).

  • ALT 1 is more interesting and reads better to me. For the original hook, I removed the dollar sign (as it is redundant to "USD"). Neutralitytalk 16:32, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Long enough and new enough when it was nominated. I couldn't access the financial times article, and the Korea JoongAng Daily wasn't loading for me, so I wasn't able to check those sources. All the other sources appeared neutral and supported the statements appropriately. No close paraphrasing. I approve the text of both hooks. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 21:57, 18 January 2017 (UTC)