- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by DannyS712 (talk) 10:30, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Homo ergaster
Improved to Good Article status by Ichthyovenator (talk). Nominated by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) at 05:23, 29 May 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall:
Article was just promoted to GA status
on May 28 and obviously has no issues with content or length. Hook is concise, neutral, and intriguing. For the citation, I specifically checked
this source from that section. It all looks good to me!
IagoQnsi (
talk) 02:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Article was just promoted to GA status on May 28 and obviously has no issues with content or length. Hook is concise, neutral, and intriguing. For the citation, I specifically checked this source from that section. It all looks good to me! IagoQnsi (talk) 02:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)