Template:Did you know nominations/Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 23:08, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the U.S. Supreme Court held in Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside that the overbreadth doctrine does not apply to commercial speech?

• ALT1:... that in Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether the proximity of High Times, National Lampoon and Rolling Stone to drug paraphernalia was marketing for illegal use?
• Reviewed: List of Croatian counties by GDP

Created/expanded by Daniel Case (talk). Self nom at 17:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

• New enough and long enough at time of nomination. QPQ done. Article reads as neutral enough. All images have acceptable copyright tags. Original hook is supported in the text and is cited. Second one takes some reading for it to make sense though it is in the text and supported by inline citation. Hook is properly formatted.
• Sources that are offline support text and were not plagiarised.
• Two fact tags need cleaning up. Otherwise, completely supported by sources. --LauraHale (talk) 10:19, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Two minor fact tags to clean and good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 10:19, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

 Done Daniel Case (talk) 14:33, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 21:23, 4 July 2012 (UTC)