Template:Did you know nominations/Henricia oculata
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:56, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Henricia oculata edit
- ... that the majority of bloody Henry starfish are host to a parasitic copopod? Source: "The parasitic cyclopoid copepod Asterocheres lillyeborgi has more than a 90% occurrence")
- Reviewed: Patricia Payne (mezzo-soprano)
Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 19:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC).
- Article (created July 4, nom July 10) was new enough at that time, is long enough, well-written, has inline citations. The hook is appealing and the nickname "bloody Henry starfish" is intriguing. Would you consider changing hook to say "90%" rather than "a majority"? This is my first DYK review, so please be aware that I may not be doing it right. HouseOfChange (talk) 17:24, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- @HouseOfChange: You are doing fine, but you should check for neutrality (not too difficult in the case of a starfish) and copyright violations, which you can do by using the Earwig tool in the DYK Toolbox above. Here is an alternative hook:
- ... that over 90% of bloody Henry starfish are host to a parasitic copopod? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:47, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Earwig says the article is clean of copyvio. MS Word says your hook is short enough and Wikipedia says your article is long enough. I like your alternative hook. This DYK looks good to go to me. HouseOfChange (talk) 20:10, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
