Template:Did you know nominations/Harlow Hill Cemetery

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Harlow Hill Cemetery edit

Harlow Hill Cemetery
Harlow Hill Cemetery

Created by Storye book (talk). Self-nominated at 21:47, 29 January 2019 (UTC).

  • Alternative image for clarity at 100x100. Caption: Angel monument in Harlow Hill Cemetery
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: valereee (talk) 15:13, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

  • I think the closeup shot is probably better at 100pix than the other. QPQ has been started but is on hold due to nominator being on vacation; is there any reason I shouldn't mark this as good to go based on the assumption of good faith? valereee (talk) 15:43, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Thank you very much for the review. If the good faith is in respect of Gerda, as you may know she is reliable and I am quite sure she will complete the nom soon. If you want to wait for the sake of my QPQ until she returns and completes her nom, I'm happy with that. Storye book (talk) 17:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
  • I'm assuming good faith on both your parts :) I just wanted to make sure that wasn't an issue with officially considering the QPQ "done" as the template marks it. As long as it's not necessary to have the QPQ actually completed, I'm fine with marking this review complete. valereee (talk) 17:22, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Yes, I'll always see a nom review through to the end. It's great to see a worthwhile nom go through, and those music ones are usually deserving. Storye book (talk) 17:46, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Just to make sure I'm being completely clear, I absolutely in no way intended to question either you or Gerda's intentions AT ALL! It was purely policy I was asking about! valereee (talk) 17:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
  • No worries, Valereee. If articles are to get through DYK you need to be able to ask all the policy questions you like. Ask away! Storye book (talk) 21:20, 30 January 2019 (UTC)