- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 01:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Gunfire (drink)
edit- ... that British Army soldiers traditionally drink Gunfire in their beds on Christmas day?
- Reviewed: Gold laundering
Created by The C of E (talk). Self nominated at 13:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC).
It may not be a requirement, but I dare say at the very least 50% of the cited sources can be found online (e.g. Source #8) perhaps you should include convenience links. Otherwise, assuming good faith, the hook is very interesting and the article meet core DYK guidelines. Cheers, ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 14:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- That's fair enough, I can do that. But is it really necessary to put the "?" sign there on minor improvement issues? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 14:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- If I can give it a solid green tick, why want me to appoint an AGF one? Not too tough also, right? ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 15:31, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- But not wanting to be too sticky, here's a
☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 15:35, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- But not wanting to be too sticky, here's a
- If I can give it a solid green tick, why want me to appoint an AGF one? Not too tough also, right? ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 15:31, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- That's fair enough, I can do that. But is it really necessary to put the "?" sign there on minor improvement issues? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 14:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
