Template:Did you know nominations/Fujiwara no Hirotsugu Rebellion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 00:35, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Fujiwara no Hirotsugu Rebellion

edit

Fujiwara no Hirotsugu

Created/expanded by Bamse (talk). Self nom at 22:05, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Certainly long enough, new enough, and referenced including for the hook. It's even more complete than the corresponding Japanese WP article. Fujiwara no Hirotsugu could stand to have his own article, but that shouldn't slow this one down. Possibly consider for Halloween because of the vengeful spirit, but it's not too important either way. Teply (talk) 22:02, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment about the image - It's not a bad image on its own and is off copyright. The trouble is the thumbnail. It doesn't really do the image justice, too small to see the face or the kana. I'd suggest promoting without the image. Teply (talk) 21:49, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Fine with me. Unfortunately it is the only image of Fujiwara no Hirotsugu that I am aware of. Thanks for the review btw. bamse (talk) 22:30, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
This image doesn't look good, however if we find a coloured alternative where the rider is prominent than the horse, it will be better.--Redtigerxyz Talk 18:08, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
The image is pretty good as a thumbnail. Might work good. But if you want to use it, you need to revise the hook to something like this:209.77.245.85 (talk) 22:45, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Alt1 is also fine with me. Not sure whether the "redirect" from Fujiwara no Hirotsugu to Fujiwara no Hirotsugu Rebellion is ok. In any case his main claim to fame is the rebellion and a bio article would have only little to add. Also in Alt1, perhaps "created"->"became" would be better. bamse (talk) 08:21, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
"created" is more accurate. "became" is POV siding with the ghost-believer against the skeptic.--Redtigerxyz Talk 18:08, 17 October 2012 (UTC)