Template:Did you know nominations/Fortifications of Gibraltar

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 17:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Fortifications of Gibraltar edit

5.25-inch dual purpose gun at Princess Anne's Battery, Gibraltar

Created by Prioryman (talk). Self nominated at 08:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC).

Notification to reviewers
Per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options, Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any conflict of interest or promotional concerns about the article under review. IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews. When you have completed a review, please update the respective table below to change the background color to green and note that the review has been completed.
First review completed
  • As far as I can see, this claim is said to have been made by John Chapple, but no source for his quote is provided. Fram (talk) 09:24, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
    • You're quite right, I had meant to add this citation but forgot. It's resolved now. Prioryman (talk) 10:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

I can't access the source for the hook. While the publisher is unknown except for this book, which doesn't have an ISBN either, the authors (certainly Hughes) seem to be recognised experts on the subject of fortifications. Fram (talk) 06:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Second review completed
  • Hook is directly cited to an offline source. Moved from userspace on the 24th May, the same day as nomination. As it is over 42,000 characters I think it just about meets the size requirements! ;) Referencing is excellent, and I think this one is good to go. You'd be mad not to try a GA nomination with it. Miyagawa (talk) 12:00, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Just to note, that I considered the COI aspects as this was a Gibraltar nomination. I can't see this being a possible COI other than it being about Gibraltar itself. So it's fine for DYK and other aspects. Miyagawa (talk) 13:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)