- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 19:47, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Fjällhyddan
edit- ... that Fjällhyddan, today a ruin, was built by Ture Malmgren in Uddevalla, Sweden, with inspiration from the hunting traditions of the medieval nobility?
- Comment: (Still makes the 7-day deadline in my timezone.) I am fairly sure this is only the third article I nominate - if not, I will happily review another, which I intend to do anyway.
Created by Stamboliyski (talk). Self nominated at 22:40, 19 February 2015 (UTC).
Newness: Fine. Length: Fine. Policy: Have to AGF on Swedish language sources. Hook: Passes the rules, but I would like to suggest a subtle rephrae: ALT1: ... that the Fjällhyddan of Uddevalla, Sweden, which now lies in ruins, was built by Ture Malmgren to resemble the hunting lodges of medieval nobility? QPQ: AGFing that this user has had less than 5 nominations. Image: Apparently in public domain. Abyssal (talk) 17:49, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Apologies for the wait. Your proposal seems fine to me. Stamboliyski (talk) 16:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Abyssal, as Stamboliyski's talk page shows messages for five DYKs that were promoted to the main page, a QPQ will be required. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- That's a bit unfair. I didn't nominate all those. Others did without informing me first. Stamboliyski (talk) 23:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: Can we settle whether or not this nomination really does require a QPQ or not? Abyssal (talk) 18:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Abyssal, I checked to see whether there was any wiggle room, but the WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria (5.) seems unambiguous:
Exception: If, at the time a nomination is promoted to the main page, its nominator has fewer than five DYK credits (whether or not self-nominated) then the nomination is exempt from QPQ.
At this point, Stamboliyski has five DYK credits: three self-nominated, and two nominated by Innotata. Since at least five articles have been featured on the main page through DYK, a QPQ is called for. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Abyssal, I checked to see whether there was any wiggle room, but the WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria (5.) seems unambiguous:
- Very well. I'll do my best. Stamboliyski (talk) 19:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the nominator has not edited here since the last comment was made almost two weeks ago. Marking for closure - unless someone cares to donate a QPQ. Fuebaey (talk) 17:21, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, I've been very busy. Give me a few hours and I'll get it done. Stamboliyski (talk) 17:26, 14 April 2015 (UTC)~
- Not sure if this is good enough, but I managed to put away some time for this. Stamboliyski (talk) 17:41, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Abyssal, now that the QPQ has been submitted, where does the nomination stand? BlueMoonset (talk) 04:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
